g-project 章鱼娘 / 乌贼娘: construction and care review
g-project 章鱼娘 / 乌贼娘: construction and care review
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
Codex checked this text against the source; independent human review is still pending.
Construction and sample observations
g-project 章鱼娘 is also called 乌贼娘. This review concerns the first generation, not the later softer version. Definite weight, length and composition are absent. The material is moderately firm, with a small entrance. Lubricant was included and the later account mentions a storage bag; accessories may vary. The newly opened surface felt dry, with oiliness and odour well controlled.
Inside are 8 strips with cylindrical suction-cup-like textures and a coiled conical terminal projection. The middle differs little from the front. The reviewer used 5 ml of medium-to-high-viscosity lubricant in two additions. This is a test condition, not a universal dosage recommendation.
Wall thickness and durability limits
The sample’s left wall was described as roughly half the right wall’s thickness. The imbalance was noticeable when held and reduced middle support and enclosure. The author had previously damaged 无次元投弹手 after a dozen or so uses. This sample had not failed comparably quickly, but that does not establish its expected lifespan.
The raised texture was distinct and the end added local variation. Expelling air increased suction, while rotation changed texture contact. These state-dependent observations establish neither universal effects nor a safety guarantee. The small entrance, relatively short interior and uneven walls remain drawbacks.
Cleaning and storage
The simple interior was straightforward to clean manually, but inside-out washing was not allowed. The bag just fits the compact body and has little spare capacity. It can be noisy during retrieval and does not guarantee discretion. Long-term durability data are absent; low odour and oiliness are not material certification.
Ratings
The headline recommends 4 stars. Each scale runs to 5: overall experience 4; durability 3; ease of cleaning 4; intensity 4; channel tightness initially 5, later 4; softness 3. The observed tightness change is retained rather than only the final value. Tightness and softness describe characteristics, not automatically better quality at higher values.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy