EXE / G-project 奶瓶萌妹 second generation — yellow: middle narrowing and soft handling
EXE / G-project 奶瓶萌妹 second generation — yellow: middle narrowing and soft handling
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.
The original headline and experience graphic showed 4 stars. The author gave 4 for newcomers and 3 for experienced users. The source also called it 奶瓶萌妹pro; the second-generation yellow identifier is retained here without mixing in other versions.
The sample included one lubricant sachet, a storage bag and the body; accessories may vary by batch. Packaging was simple, without an internal plastic shell. The box was firm, but this does not guarantee protection from shipping damage. The bottle-like body was compact and easy to store. No weight or channel length was provided.
The broad opening had small bumps. The middle narrowed, then the end widened again. Bumps and transverse ridges formed the main internal texture. The reviewer could not clearly distinguish most internal bumps, although those at the entrance were more apparent. Passing the middle constriction led to an abrupt increase in space, with some localized end feedback.
Suction was more noticeable after air was expelled. The author preferred a slower pace for the low-intensity design, finding feedback less distinguishable during faster movement. This is an individual impression, not a guarantee of intensity or duration.
Both the body and interior felt soft, with comfortable handling. No damage was found during the review, but long-term durability was not verified. Cleaning was convenient. The author mentioned inside-out washing, without testing repeated folding life; this does not imply rough turning is safe.
Ratings: experience 4 in the graphic, 4 for newcomers and 3 for experienced users; durability 4; cleaning 5; intensity 2; tightness 3, with looser front and end and a tighter middle; softness 4. Strengths were soft handling, low intensity and suction variation around the middle narrowing. Limitations were a short channel, indistinct internal bumps and weaker feedback during fast movement.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy