3D骨骼护士: internal frame and difficult cleaning
3D骨骼护士: internal frame and difficult cleaning
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
Codex checked this text against the source; independent human review is still pending.
EXE 3D骨骼护士 has a headline recommendation of 3/5, separate from the body's experience score of 4/5. The sample weighs 400g and has a 12cm passage. An internal frame is its main construction feature. The narrow body makes the hard frame readily noticeable alongside soft material when held. The abdominal area feels soft and the waist is defined, but its contours do not establish realistic human proportions.
Passage and firmness zones
The front is soft and intricately textured; the rear has a larger cavity and firmer material. The source gives hardness numbers of 10 and 90 respectively, without a scale, unit or measurement method. They are not standardized material-hardness results. Packaging describes front granules distributed through 360 degrees, middle protrusions in 3 directions and an end constriction cavity.
These are construction or packaging descriptions. The reviewer explicitly says most design details were not perceptible in testing. The soft front section is short and particularly difficult to distinguish. Some regions feel tight, but the claimed response of every feature was not verified.
Durability, cleaning and drying
Oil release is low, but the body easily picks up dirt and some marks were considered difficult to remove. Construction complicates cleaning and care, while drying is also difficult. The source mentions previous material damage after sunlight exposure without clearly identifying it as the same model. Heat, cleaners and direct sun should not be assumed compatible without manufacturer guidance; exaggerated claims that soap necessarily dissolves the body are not established.
Original ratings
All scores are out of 5: experience 4, durability 3, cleaning graphic 3, intensity 4, passage tightness 4 and softness 4. The headline's 3 remains separate. Despite the cleaning graphic of 3, the text stresses substantial difficulty. High experience scores do not remove the space occupied by the frame, indistinct texture response, soiling or slow drying. Chemical composition and long-term service life are unverified.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy