COOLP Camphorencer Review
COOLP Camphorencer Review
Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.
This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.
Identification, dimensions and material
Camphorencer is the identifier supplied by the source. “来劲网红” is the author’s Chinese rendering, not a confirmed official name. The sample weighs 387g, with a 15.5cm exterior and 12.5cm channel, using COOLP’s existing long-cylinder mould.
Relative hardness is -1, with good stretch, less tackiness than 鬼退治2 and noticeable odour and oil release. The soft elongated rear swings during handling, while oil affects grip. The source suggests a small towel for holding, not as a substitute for cleaning. Hardness is a subjective category.
Thin regions contain small black specks that could not be washed away. The author suggests moulding-rod residue, without confirmation. Their safety is not independently established.
Three-sided raised serpentine structure
Like 鬼退治2, the interior has winding textures, but here three raised surfaces converge. The comparison uses a more recessed upper/lower arrangement. Flat-topped projections leave a larger central gap, weakening enclosure even after air displacement. The author illustrates this with triangular versus flat moulding-rod geometry, not confirmed process measurements.
Small transverse textures cover the large projections, retaining dense fine feedback rather than only coarse blocks. Raised contours are clear, but closure and pressure are weaker than in 鬼退治2, with noticeable internal space.
Feedback and rating
The main character is three-dimensional texture plus fine transverse detail in soft material. It offers variation without dense full enclosure. It is a different serpentine variant, not an equivalent of 鬼退治2. The source also mentions the tighter structure of 恶魔快乐 hard version without formal comparison scores.
The written recommendation is 4 stars, with no separate title rating or other category scores. Limits include oil and odour, swinging form, unexplained specks and weaker enclosure from the three flat-topped surfaces. No cleaning, drying-time or long-term durability conclusions are supplied.




Source and editorial note
This article is an edited translation of the linked original review, not a new hands-on test by voalice. Scores describe the original reviewer’s observations. Product names may retain their original spelling; translated names are descriptive, not verified official names.
Commercial links lead to iSexy Shop and KimochiLife. Availability is not verified here.
Editorial policy