LoveFactor 御神子2代EX: a narrower channel with less dependence on air removal

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Specifications and exterior

The body weighs 783 g, measures 16.5 cm overall and has a 14 cm interior. Its exterior is unchanged from the standard second generation. The source describes the first- and second-generation EX revisions as retaining the exterior mould while redesigning the channel, similar to 麻美EX. The simple entrance and cylindrical body have few details. Weight and a somewhat squared profile make one-handed grip tiring; two hands provide better stability.

Comparative firmness is -1, with a milky scent, little oil seepage and no pungent smell in the sample. The source's favourable service-life claim lacks standard testing and is not a lifespan guarantee. A larger surface adds care requirements; powder and other treatments should follow product instructions.

Channel revision

The route remains the same, but smaller, densely arranged textures replace the old loosely formed details with gear-like interlocking surfaces. Reduced cavity space makes tightness apparent from the entrance. A small end chamber is added, although contact there is faint and not a major feature.

The standard second generation depended heavily on expelling air to reveal contact between the opposing structures. EX gives clear surrounding contact without that step, more like the first generation. Air removal still adds some tightness, but much less than before. The reviewer considers narrowing and improved moulding precision substantial improvements.

Comparison and assessment

Against NPG 名器证明15石川澪, the reviewer still prefers the comparison model's interlocking feel. Although its finishing is rougher, larger structures and narrower spaces produce more pronounced intensity. This is a subjective comparison with no corresponding numerical intensity scores.

Recommendation is 4 stars. Less dependence on air removal and a more compact channel are strengths. Handling weight, a weak end feature and stronger interlocking contact in the comparison model are limitations. No separate cleaning or durability ratings or tests are provided.