G-project 六连脉二代: high firmness and very limited stretch

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Measurements and material

The sample weighed 532g, with an external length of 15cm and a channel length of 13cm. Its cylindrical body has a simplified torso outline, minimal detail at the front, some texture at the rear and a considerably wider lower section.

The source rated its firmness at a relative +3. There was almost no oil release or odor, and the material felt like slightly softened plastic. +3 is a subjective comparison, not a standardized hardness result. The surface and interior showed no obvious damage and the molded contours were clear. However, the finished body had extremely little stretch: surface firmness and actual extensibility are not interchangeable properties.

Structure and version differences

Compared with the first 六连脉 and the special edition, this version has firmer material and a different body. The transverse HIDA ridges implied by the name are barely apparent. The source's suggestion about a different contract-manufacturing origin was unverified.

Inside the broad body is a narrow, straight channel with relatively small projections and weakly defined texture. Narrowness is not the only issue: limited stretch magnifies compression.

Discomfort during testing

The round entrance barely deformed, making entry difficult and requiring considerable force. Once inside, sustained compression caused marked discomfort even without reciprocating movement, with little elastic cushioning. The source compared this with 唤起小恶魔: both produced compression-related discomfort, but the earlier product's issue was attributed to channel narrowness, whereas material was considered the main limitation here, intensified by the narrow layout.

These are observations from this sample, not a finding of injury for every user. The overall recommendation was 1 star, with no separate category scores. Pronounced discomfort should not be reinterpreted as normal high intensity, nor should this account be taken as a reason to force entry through a low-stretch opening.