GOSE 田舍秘话 mother version: substantial support and three distinct zones

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Specifications and comparative firmness

The body weighs approximately 784 g, measures about 18 cm overall and has a roughly 15.5 cm internal channel. Its broad cylindrical form provides relatively even surrounding thickness. “Close to 800 g” in the narrative is a rounded description, not another measurement. Compared with the other series model, it is heavier and rounder, with fewer muscle-like surface details.

The outer layer and front use material placed at level 0 on the reviewer's ordinary-firmness scale. Smell and oil seepage were limited. A local inner section at the rear is slightly softer, around -1; the other series model's end is around -3. These are comparative tactile levels, not standardised hardness measurements. This model's roughly one-level contrast is difficult to distinguish through the outer layer and clearer in cross-section.

Structure and experience

The channel progresses through an entrance transition, spiral texture and block-like structures, producing 3 zones. Rather than the finer texture of the other series model, it relies on alternating larger contours. A ring structure at the entrance helps reduce air leakage. After expelling air, the sample's surrounding contact and pressure changes were more noticeable, although no pressure was measured.

Against GOSE 圣洁之宫, the reviewer describes subjective emphasis as approximately 70% end and 30% channel for that model, versus 20% end and 80% channel here. The 70/30 and 20/80 ratios are experience analogies, not dimensions or measured structural proportions. This design places more emphasis on the route through the channel than the end.

Limitations and assessment

Two-handed support is more stable for the bulky, heavy body. The subtle material contrast should not be mistaken for a dramatic firmness transition. Internal finishing was ordinary, with local moulding defects in the sample.

Overall recommendation is 4 stars. No separate stimulation, durability or cleaning scores or corresponding tests are reported; substantial support is not proof of durability. Even surrounding contact, improved contact after air removal and clear zoning are strengths, balanced against weight, moulding details and weak material contrast.