TMT 圣女的欲望 generation 3 firm/soft: similar materials, limited channel changes

Images were selected by position and quality; individual human review is pending.

This text passed automated basic checks only; it has not undergone model or human review.

Shared exterior and material

The source records a 1.82 kg body. Both third-generation versions retain the first- and second-generation exterior, making 4 models from the same mould. Surface detail is limited, and the reviewer found insufficient substantial model-like contact. This is a preference assessment, not a universal conclusion about that weight.

Both use softer material and fall at comparative level -1, less than one level apart. The firm version stretches slightly less; the soft version slightly more. The practical difference is small, so the names do not establish a substantial firmness contrast. No composition or standard hardness test is supplied.

Generation three uses a thick gift box and leather-like skirt accessory. No colour transfer was observed in the sample, but excessive fabric around the opening obstructs access. This does not guarantee long-term colourfastness.

Firm-version channels

The two lengths are 13.5 cm and 13 cm. The first has sparse transverse lines and low undulations with poorly defined contours. The second is also nearly smooth, without clear independent texture. The reviewer found limited improvement over the first two generations.

Soft-version channels

The first resembles 水着琉璃子 and the firm 樱川爱 design. It offers more variation than the firm version here, but is still not finely detailed. The second attempts opposing upper/lower structures yet feels mainly smooth. The source does not separately state its channel lengths; the firm model's figures should not automatically be applied.

Ratings and limitations

Both receive 2 stars for overall quality. Softer material makes basic use gentler, but exterior design, weak texture and limited revision remain concerns. No separate numerical stimulation, cleaning or durability scores are given. Increased softness is not evidence of improved service life.